If Your Message Fails to Communicate, It's Your Fault
This is the cautionary word from business communications expert Tom Sant, who’s interviewed in the March 2008 edition of Management Consulting News.
Sant’s latest book is The Language of Success. In the interview, he explains that it’s the business writer’s responsibility to “take the reader into account and modify the message to get through—even if your reader is dumb as a post.” Sant sees this obligation as a contract of sorts. If you breach that agreement, he says, readers have an absolute right to be put off.
It seems that this kind of breach often stems from the writer’s unwillingness or inability to communicate in his or her own voice. Sant refers to this as a “lapse into [ ] pseudo language, a nonfunctional way of communicating which they think is somehow superior to what they could produce themselves.” In his book, he identifies four common pseudo-languages:
- Fluff - Using vague generalizations and assertions
- Guff – Using big words, long sentences, lots of passive voice and convoluted constructions to convey superior intelligence or knowledge
- Geek – Using jargon-filled language instead of everyday terms
- Weasel – Using lots of subjunctive construction so that everything comes across as a hypothetical and nothing stands as an assertion
In addition to outing these pseudo-languages, Sant quotes a study finding that “comprehension drops dramatically when you substitute a longer synonym for just one out of every six short, everyday words.” Not only do big words make our writing harder to understand, they also make readers question our competence.